Brooms, Boys and Enid Blyton
July 7th, 2006
Housework bothers me. But not because it is of itself bothersome - I’ve had some of the calmest moments of my life holding a broom, feeling my body sway backwards and forwards, settling into the unendingness of it… knowing millions of people world-over are, in the same moment, sweeping their mud-floors, their front door-step, their kitchen lino. In those moments I’ve noticed the pointlessness of it (”this dust will sure-as-anything be here again next week”; “gees, how many thousands of hours have my ancestors spent just sweeping - and what have they got to show for it? Where are they all now? Dead!” etc.). And somehow by touching this endless pointlessness of it through time and space, it’s actually become quite soothing to do it: “I do this because it is part of surviving. And I survive in the same way my ancestors survived, and my fellow-humans survive. I do this so I can live in a clear space. So I can respect these three rooms where I live, so they can help me to be happy, and so I don’t cringe at dust when I put my feet on the wooden tongue-and-groove slats every morning. I wouldn’t want to pay someone to do this for me because it’s one of my few chances (chopping wood/ carrying water not forthcoming at the minute) to engage in the fundamental work of staying alive - and connect to my basic human condition.”
No, housework bothers me because girls do it and guys (more often than not) don’t (Beloved Patterner excluded).
When I was younger, the boys got the wood in and we girls tidied up. They made their beds, sure, but it was the two daughters who ‘put the wash in’ and helped fold socks in front of Blind Date on a Saturday night. I remember being strangely confused that my little bro had to be shown how to use the washing machine age 16 - how on earth had he got away with not knowing?
But it’s not his fault - it’s just how the cookie’s been crumbling for, well, a few hundred generations.
And the recipe for this particular girls-tidy/boys-carry crumbly cookie is complicated. It’s about society’s gender roles, it’s about women-at-home, it’s (perhaps) about psychological predispositions to multi-tasking, and it’s about our particular home-drilling by Mum. It’s about what we read and think; and what, as children, what was said to us - and read to us. And this is all changing.
I remember once, in a dusty corner of the University Library desperately avoiding finals revision, I fell into flicking through yellowing periodicals around me - and found a feminist children’s story in Signs magazine. I read it all and it was great: Girl has adventures home-alone; Mum gets in late at night; Girl clears up naughty mess quickly, but she’s not caught because Mum’s still snogging the current boyfriend in the car. I thought, Wow! If only I’d had that as a child: Beatrix Potter, Hans Christian Anderson (and Ronald Dahl for a bit of a shake-up) don’t exactly a liberated woman make.
This all came to me today because I’d heard that the Famous Five books have been revised so that the boys do some housework. My first reaction was, Fantastic! My second was, What does the Daily Mail think?
Row faster, George! The PC meddlers are chasing us!
Neither the Famous Five nor the Secret Seven are any longer permitted to pursue their adventures without hindrance from the PC zealots. Julian and Dick are now required to do the housework with the girls. Already, Mary and Jill of the Adventurous Four have been ‘updated’ to Pippa and Zoe. It can only be a matter of time before the stop-at-home, cake-baking mummies of Blyton’s fiction will be sent out to work in shipyards as crane drivers while the daddies have to relinquish their City jobs and become house-husbands.
The logic is priceless Mail:
1. Boy picks up broom
ergo
2. Mother must drive a shipyard crane
ergo
3. World order has collapsed and palpable madness undermines All That’s Good.
ergo
4. Boys mustn’t sweep.
You gotta laugh, if only because things have already changed. The cookie’s crumbling differently because the dough mix ain’t the same, and the Daily Mail doesn’t matter (that much - though it matters a darn sight more than it should).
So Thank God I’m an 80’s child not a 50’s housewife… and that twentysomething blokes don’t think us twentysomething girls are crazy for insisting on ‘taking it in turns’ (though I have a niggling feeling that my twentysomething bloke was read feminist children’s books as a child).
4 Responses to “Brooms, Boys and Enid Blyton”
Leave a Reply
Brooms, Boys and Enid Blyton
July 7th, 2006
Housework bothers me. But not because it is of itself bothersome - I’ve had some of the calmest moments of my life holding a broom, feeling my body sway backwards and forwards, settling into the unendingness of it… knowing millions of people world-over are, in the same moment, sweeping their mud-floors, their front door-step, their kitchen lino. In those moments I’ve noticed the pointlessness of it (”this dust will sure-as-anything be here again next week”; “gees, how many thousands of hours have my ancestors spent just sweeping - and what have they got to show for it? Where are they all now? Dead!” etc.). And somehow by touching this endless pointlessness of it through time and space, it’s actually become quite soothing to do it: “I do this because it is part of surviving. And I survive in the same way my ancestors survived, and my fellow-humans survive. I do this so I can live in a clear space. So I can respect these three rooms where I live, so they can help me to be happy, and so I don’t cringe at dust when I put my feet on the wooden tongue-and-groove slats every morning. I wouldn’t want to pay someone to do this for me because it’s one of my few chances (chopping wood/ carrying water not forthcoming at the minute) to engage in the fundamental work of staying alive - and connect to my basic human condition.”
No, housework bothers me because girls do it and guys (more often than not) don’t (Beloved Patterner excluded).
When I was younger, the boys got the wood in and we girls tidied up. They made their beds, sure, but it was the two daughters who ‘put the wash in’ and helped fold socks in front of Blind Date on a Saturday night. I remember being strangely confused that my little bro had to be shown how to use the washing machine age 16 - how on earth had he got away with not knowing?
But it’s not his fault - it’s just how the cookie’s been crumbling for, well, a few hundred generations.
And the recipe for this particular girls-tidy/boys-carry crumbly cookie is complicated. It’s about society’s gender roles, it’s about women-at-home, it’s (perhaps) about psychological predispositions to multi-tasking, and it’s about our particular home-drilling by Mum. It’s about what we read and think; and what, as children, what was said to us - and read to us. And this is all changing.
I remember once, in a dusty corner of the University Library desperately avoiding finals revision, I fell into flicking through yellowing periodicals around me - and found a feminist children’s story in Signs magazine. I read it all and it was great: Girl has adventures home-alone; Mum gets in late at night; Girl clears up naughty mess quickly, but she’s not caught because Mum’s still snogging the current boyfriend in the car. I thought, Wow! If only I’d had that as a child: Beatrix Potter, Hans Christian Anderson (and Ronald Dahl for a bit of a shake-up) don’t exactly a liberated woman make.
This all came to me today because I’d heard that the Famous Five books have been revised so that the boys do some housework. My first reaction was, Fantastic! My second was, What does the Daily Mail think?
Row faster, George! The PC meddlers are chasing us!
Neither the Famous Five nor the Secret Seven are any longer permitted to pursue their adventures without hindrance from the PC zealots. Julian and Dick are now required to do the housework with the girls. Already, Mary and Jill of the Adventurous Four have been ‘updated’ to Pippa and Zoe. It can only be a matter of time before the stop-at-home, cake-baking mummies of Blyton’s fiction will be sent out to work in shipyards as crane drivers while the daddies have to relinquish their City jobs and become house-husbands.
The logic is priceless Mail:
1. Boy picks up broom
ergo
2. Mother must drive a shipyard crane
ergo
3. World order has collapsed and palpable madness undermines All That’s Good.
ergo
4. Boys mustn’t sweep.
You gotta laugh, if only because things have already changed. The cookie’s crumbling differently because the dough mix ain’t the same, and the Daily Mail doesn’t matter (that much - though it matters a darn sight more than it should).
So Thank God I’m an 80’s child not a 50’s housewife… and that twentysomething blokes don’t think us twentysomething girls are crazy for insisting on ‘taking it in turns’ (though I have a niggling feeling that my twentysomething bloke was read feminist children’s books as a child).
4 Responses to “Brooms, Boys and Enid Blyton”
-
Sandy D. Says:
July 20th, 2006 at 5:41 pmInteresting. I have the same take on many daily tasks (well, when I’m in a good mood), and have been a little appalled by both the left (Linda Hirshman telling women it’s their duty to hire scut work out) and the right (Caitlin Flanagan never having changed a sheet) and their elitist attitudes.
I just blogged about an early feminist and her quotes on the division of housework here: http://imponderabilia.blogspot.com/2006/07/now-we-can-begineighty-six-years-later.html
I’m enjoying your blog a lot, and am glad I found it through the most recent feminist carnival.
-
Sabha Says:
August 2nd, 2006 at 5:24 pmI don’t know, I think that the reality of that “feminist children’s story” is quite different, that was my childhood, I could literally have written that story, 9 years old watching “girls on top” and “Hale and Pace” on a wednesday night while my mum was out, eating whatever sweet food was in the house, it was thrilling being home alone but also frightening and I had watched far too much crimewatch UK by that time to stave off fears of kidnappers and burglars. And I still cringe at the thought of my mum kissing boyfriends in front of me, I wanted a dad and a mum who kissed him, not the emotional insecurity and embarrassment of random boyfriends, sorry but I loved the stories of happy (nucelar?) familys and longed to be part of one myself.
-
monkeypooshoes Says:
August 3rd, 2006 at 12:32 pm[…] But anyway, I stumbled across a rather nice entry on boys and housework, which I’m just going to link to, and then you can pretend you read it in my blog. Feminish on boys and housework. (Although, just for the record, I reckon the Daily Mail has more influence than the author thinks.)
-
natasha Says:
August 4th, 2006 at 4:44 pmThanks, Sabha. It means a lot to have your thoughts - I knew you’d keep me on my toes…
There’s nothing like the sharp twang of experience to wake up my milky idealism!
It was for you as you say it was - I see that; a good wake-up call for me.But I’ve been wondering, do you think the sickly-sweet nuclear ideal around you (on telly, in films and books, among friends, in culture) was partly responsible, so to speak? Do you think it would still have been difficult/cringing/embarrassing if the pattern of your mum’s life was more common, more accepted? I remember from all our women’s history stuff how recent the nuclear family ideal is (which is I guess why you put it in brackets - you know that too!)…
July 20th, 2006 at 5:41 pm
Interesting. I have the same take on many daily tasks (well, when I’m in a good mood), and have been a little appalled by both the left (Linda Hirshman telling women it’s their duty to hire scut work out) and the right (Caitlin Flanagan never having changed a sheet) and their elitist attitudes.
I just blogged about an early feminist and her quotes on the division of housework here: http://imponderabilia.blogspot.com/2006/07/now-we-can-begineighty-six-years-later.html
I’m enjoying your blog a lot, and am glad I found it through the most recent feminist carnival.
August 2nd, 2006 at 5:24 pm
I don’t know, I think that the reality of that “feminist children’s story” is quite different, that was my childhood, I could literally have written that story, 9 years old watching “girls on top” and “Hale and Pace” on a wednesday night while my mum was out, eating whatever sweet food was in the house, it was thrilling being home alone but also frightening and I had watched far too much crimewatch UK by that time to stave off fears of kidnappers and burglars. And I still cringe at the thought of my mum kissing boyfriends in front of me, I wanted a dad and a mum who kissed him, not the emotional insecurity and embarrassment of random boyfriends, sorry but I loved the stories of happy (nucelar?) familys and longed to be part of one myself.
August 3rd, 2006 at 12:32 pm
[…] But anyway, I stumbled across a rather nice entry on boys and housework, which I’m just going to link to, and then you can pretend you read it in my blog. Feminish on boys and housework. (Although, just for the record, I reckon the Daily Mail has more influence than the author thinks.)
August 4th, 2006 at 4:44 pm
Thanks, Sabha. It means a lot to have your thoughts - I knew you’d keep me on my toes…
There’s nothing like the sharp twang of experience to wake up my milky idealism!
It was for you as you say it was - I see that; a good wake-up call for me.
But I’ve been wondering, do you think the sickly-sweet nuclear ideal around you (on telly, in films and books, among friends, in culture) was partly responsible, so to speak? Do you think it would still have been difficult/cringing/embarrassing if the pattern of your mum’s life was more common, more accepted? I remember from all our women’s history stuff how recent the nuclear family ideal is (which is I guess why you put it in brackets - you know that too!)…