Who’d have thought it? Anger can vanish, instantly
September 26th, 2006
The sun is warm here on the dry rocky plateau of the causse, and there are improbable numbers of flies from the sheep and goats. They have developed an unfortunate habit of mating on my shoulder. (I would normally call myself fairly fly-tolerant, but this proximity of parasitical procreation is pushing me over my bug-loving edge.)
The thing is, is the sun ever not warm?! Is the sun ever not shining? Sometimes on cloudy days I remember how hot and bright the sun still is - it’s just that the clouds are in the way. The sun is still shining, even on the greyest days.
I have a little game when I’m feeling stuck with something, or caught up in worries. I ask myself,
Where are the stars, Natasha?
It works every time. They’re there, and there and there and there. Just millions and billions of light years away, but in every direction, even in daytime. When I remember where the stars are things look different and I feel better (even in the middle of a newsroom).
I’ve been angry this past 24 hours, and I’ve been doing my best to take care of my anger. I’ve written a lot, I’ve talked to myself a lot, and last night I took refuge in the stars, which were bright (and the Great Bear didn’t look like a saucepan after a while….).
There’s a good little practice I once learned about what to do when I’m furious, when my buttons have been pressed. You know the kind of times. The times when you want to kick a wall, or throw something - or shout. (And if there’s a door nearby I’d want to slam it.) In these times, I do my best to follow this little gatha:

I close my eyes and look deeply.
Three hundred years from now
Where will you be and where shall I be?
As the zen master says,
Looking at the future, we see that the other person is very precious to us. When we know we can lose them at any moment. We are no longer angry. We want to embrace her or him and say,
“How wonderful, you are still alive. I am so happy. How could I be angry with you? Both of us have to die someday and while we are still alive and together it is foolish to be angry at each other.”
The reason we are foolish enough to make ourselves suffer and make the other person suffer is we forget that we and the other person are impermanent. Someday when we die we will lose all our possessions, our power, our family, everything. Our freedom, peace and joy in the present moment is the most important thing we have.
3 Responses to “Who’d have thought it? Anger can vanish, instantly”
Leave a Reply
Who’d have thought it? Anger can vanish, instantly
September 26th, 2006
The sun is warm here on the dry rocky plateau of the causse, and there are improbable numbers of flies from the sheep and goats. They have developed an unfortunate habit of mating on my shoulder. (I would normally call myself fairly fly-tolerant, but this proximity of parasitical procreation is pushing me over my bug-loving edge.)
The thing is, is the sun ever not warm?! Is the sun ever not shining? Sometimes on cloudy days I remember how hot and bright the sun still is - it’s just that the clouds are in the way. The sun is still shining, even on the greyest days.
I have a little game when I’m feeling stuck with something, or caught up in worries. I ask myself,
Where are the stars, Natasha?
It works every time. They’re there, and there and there and there. Just millions and billions of light years away, but in every direction, even in daytime. When I remember where the stars are things look different and I feel better (even in the middle of a newsroom).
I’ve been angry this past 24 hours, and I’ve been doing my best to take care of my anger. I’ve written a lot, I’ve talked to myself a lot, and last night I took refuge in the stars, which were bright (and the Great Bear didn’t look like a saucepan after a while….).
There’s a good little practice I once learned about what to do when I’m furious, when my buttons have been pressed. You know the kind of times. The times when you want to kick a wall, or throw something - or shout. (And if there’s a door nearby I’d want to slam it.) In these times, I do my best to follow this little gatha:

I close my eyes and look deeply.
Three hundred years from now
Where will you be and where shall I be?
As the zen master says,
Looking at the future, we see that the other person is very precious to us. When we know we can lose them at any moment. We are no longer angry. We want to embrace her or him and say,
“How wonderful, you are still alive. I am so happy. How could I be angry with you? Both of us have to die someday and while we are still alive and together it is foolish to be angry at each other.”
The reason we are foolish enough to make ourselves suffer and make the other person suffer is we forget that we and the other person are impermanent. Someday when we die we will lose all our possessions, our power, our family, everything. Our freedom, peace and joy in the present moment is the most important thing we have.
3 Responses to “Who’d have thought it? Anger can vanish, instantly”
-
RubyBlue Says:
September 26th, 2006 at 4:06 pmI myself am in the middle of a fight between anger and forgiveness at the moment. Where do you draw the line between a forgiving spirit - the one which recognises that holding on to anger not only hurts the object of your anger but destroys yourself (both spiritually and physically) and a very real need to make others acknowledge the pain that they do to you which engendered the anger in the first instance? I understand that continually holding onto my hurt and anger is unhealthy, but unless an
individual knows exactly how much they have hurt you, expressed to them and impressed on them by your articulated anger - how can you possibly stop them continuing to hurt you or hurting you again? In the service of self respect is it not sometimes good to have anger…….as a kind of energy to protect the soul? As a kind of fuel to drive action ? -
natasha Says:
September 26th, 2006 at 6:54 pmAh, RubyBlue, I know exactly what you mean.
Sometimes I need my anger… So that it forces me to accept (in myself) and share (with the other person) that it’s not okay; what they’ve done is not okay. If I didn’t have my anger, I wouldn’t know it (and my hurt might be, say, suppressed), and I wouldn’t be able to tell them: don’t do that, it hurts. So I agree, in some ways it protects the soul.
When my anger boils up, I get a chance to look at it. (If I’ve managed to take myself for a walk, or spotted the stars a million miles under my desk.) And when I look at it I can see which buttons have been pressed, to see which ways I’ve been wound up… coz in fact the buttons are mine - they’re some sensitivity, some value or point of principle, or some old wound. And then I get to say “Ah, hello old wound, where did you come from? When did you start?” Why does it hurt, for example, when someone says they don’t like the way I speak?
But what you’re saying really reminds me of, is an important point in feminist buddhist practice (that one Sylvia Wetzel writes about) saying women need to be able to express anger - it’s part of, as you say, our self-respect… Some feminist psychologists say Western women are taught that anger is ugly, unfeminine and ‘unbecoming’… so we suppress it, and so become curled up into ourselves, and not free, and full of knots.
I know I want to express my anger, but if possible by shouting at the sky, and not the other person. Then I can take some time (a few days, maybe) to see how I can most powerfully express my hurt to the other person in a way that they’ll understand. At the Immanent Grove, if you’re angry with someone you can take your time to tell them they made you angry (a few hours, or a few days) - but a week is the absolute limit. You have to approach them in a week, max!!
-
natasha Says:
September 26th, 2006 at 6:57 pmI just found this from Malcolm X:
Usually when people are sad, they don’t do anything. They just cry over their condition. But when they get angry, they bring about a change.
Quoted in Malcolm X Speaks (1965)
September 26th, 2006 at 4:06 pm
I myself am in the middle of a fight between anger and forgiveness at the moment. Where do you draw the line between a forgiving spirit - the one which recognises that holding on to anger not only hurts the object of your anger but destroys yourself (both spiritually and physically) and a very real need to make others acknowledge the pain that they do to you which engendered the anger in the first instance? I understand that continually holding onto my hurt and anger is unhealthy, but unless an
individual knows exactly how much they have hurt you, expressed to them and impressed on them by your articulated anger - how can you possibly stop them continuing to hurt you or hurting you again? In the service of self respect is it not sometimes good to have anger…….as a kind of energy to protect the soul? As a kind of fuel to drive action ?
September 26th, 2006 at 6:54 pm
Ah, RubyBlue, I know exactly what you mean.
Sometimes I need my anger… So that it forces me to accept (in myself) and share (with the other person) that it’s not okay; what they’ve done is not okay. If I didn’t have my anger, I wouldn’t know it (and my hurt might be, say, suppressed), and I wouldn’t be able to tell them: don’t do that, it hurts. So I agree, in some ways it protects the soul.
When my anger boils up, I get a chance to look at it. (If I’ve managed to take myself for a walk, or spotted the stars a million miles under my desk.) And when I look at it I can see which buttons have been pressed, to see which ways I’ve been wound up… coz in fact the buttons are mine - they’re some sensitivity, some value or point of principle, or some old wound. And then I get to say “Ah, hello old wound, where did you come from? When did you start?” Why does it hurt, for example, when someone says they don’t like the way I speak?
But what you’re saying really reminds me of, is an important point in feminist buddhist practice (that one Sylvia Wetzel writes about) saying women need to be able to express anger - it’s part of, as you say, our self-respect… Some feminist psychologists say Western women are taught that anger is ugly, unfeminine and ‘unbecoming’… so we suppress it, and so become curled up into ourselves, and not free, and full of knots.
I know I want to express my anger, but if possible by shouting at the sky, and not the other person. Then I can take some time (a few days, maybe) to see how I can most powerfully express my hurt to the other person in a way that they’ll understand. At the Immanent Grove, if you’re angry with someone you can take your time to tell them they made you angry (a few hours, or a few days) - but a week is the absolute limit. You have to approach them in a week, max!!
September 26th, 2006 at 6:57 pm
I just found this from Malcolm X:
Quoted in Malcolm X Speaks (1965)