Google, rape and search data
November 14th, 2006
Yesterday, someone came to this blog having typed “HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE” into Google.
(Hello, whoever you were in Falmouth, Maine, USA, using Firefox 2.0 on Microsoft Windows XP. It was 11.15pm for you and your IP was: 72.224.132.# (ROADRUNNER-NYC). I’m sorry you only stayed on here for 0.0 seconds and didn’t have a chance to read the part of my post about not raping women.
If I was a Christian, I’d be praying for you. I’m a meditator, so I’ll be breathing for you instead, doing my best to understand that this kind of Google search can only really come from somebody who is already suffering themselves.)
As you can probably guess, this troubles me. It troubles me that someone is interested in finding out (though granted it could just be research for a fiction book). And it troubles me that we’ve created this thing called the Internet where interested folks can find out. It’s not exactly something they’d ask down the pub, in the Classifieds or over the water cooler at work.
I ran the same Google search myself, to see how they’d got to me. I have a porn filter on my search preferences, I was using google.com, and I was mildly relieved at the results. The first is “How to Prevent Rape”, the second a little more dodgy (I didn’t click through), then there’s “Reduce the Risk of Becoming a Victim of Drug Induced Rape”, “Punishments for rape”, a social welfare article about rape victims, “Can someone rape and not know it”, and then my very own “Flesh, cloth and rape” post, from which Google picks out the phrase: “If you break into a house and find a woman there, don’t rape her. If your friend thinks it’s okay to rape someone, tell him it’s not”.
I felt a small wave of gratitude for Google come over me, and wondered if there was greater censorship than my (self-chosen) porn filter. I was then surprised to find that the term “how to rape” figures on Google’s search trend radar - there’s a fairly vague graph you can examine here, which tells you little more than that there was a marked decrease in searches for ‘how to rape’ in January and February 2006, whatever that might mean.
I’m still troubled by what drives a human being to want to search for those things; and I’m still troubled that we humans have created this beast of the internet that can (in principle) help people find out. After all, “HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE” is a different question from the much more reasonable “WHAT IS RAPE”, and presumably it comes with the corollary “HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE WITHOUT GETTING NICKED” .
I immediately recalled the hoo-haa a few months ago after AOL inadvertently released search data which included which user (a numeric ID) had searched for what (the data was swiftly removed but had already been mirrored here). I can deconstruct my visitor in Falmouth, Maine, and reflect on the bizarre ways in which their unhappy world briefly collided with mine… but it’s altogether more telling when you can pull together a user’s search history over, say, several months. The 3-month AOL database of search terms is startling, revealing as it does users’ deepest (and darkest) queries. CNET News.com pulled together a few user profiles, assembling their queries chronologically:
Based on the number of local searches, AOL user 1515830 appears to be a resident of Ohio’s Mahoning County. On March 1, user 1515830 was trying to find the amount of calories in chai tea and bananas. But on March 9, the searches took a darker turn:
chai tea calories
calories in bananas
aftermath of incest
how to tell your family you’re a victim of incest
pottery barn
curtains
surgical help for depression
oakland raiders comforter set
can you adopt after a suicide attempt
who is not allowed to adopt
i hate men
medication to enhance female desire
jobs in denver colorado
teaching positions in denver colorado
how long will the swelling last after my tummy tuck
divorce laws in ohio
free remote keyloggers
baked macaroni and cheese with sour cream
how to deal with anger
teaching jobs with the denver school system
marriage counseling tips
anti psychotic drugs
There was also this:
Some AOL users seem to be worried that an abusive partner in a relationship may come back to hurt them. This person, AOL user 005315, searched for information about prison inmates, gang members, sociopaths in relationships, and women who were murdered in southern California last year:
resources for utility bill paying assistance in southern california
section 8 housing southern california
los angeles county ca. gang member pictures
orange county california jails inmate information
fractured ankle
letters and responses written by women to emotionally
abusive partners
men that use emotional and physical abandonment to control their partner
warning signs of a mans infidelity or sexual addiction
the sociopathic relationship
southern california newspaper stories about woman murdered by boyfriend in pomona december2005
names of females murdered or found dead in pomona california in 2005
characteristics of a sociopath in a relationship
a person that shows lack of empathy
help in writing a letter to a abusive narcissistic ex boyfriend
how to hurt the narcissistic man
retaliating against the narcisisstic man
And this:
For a three-month period, AOL user 2708, apparently a resident of the greater Boston area, was searching for little else. Her search terms suggest that she signed up her ex-boyfriend for Columbia House CDs, articles on “gay life,” and Christian literature–while shopping for women’s Harley Davidson boots. User 2708’s ex apparently lives in New Hampshire:
revenge tactics
the woman’s book of revenge
dirty tricks for chicks
voice changer
how to humiliate someone
bill me pay later for cd’s
scams to play on people
how to get revenge on an old lover
i hate my ex boyfriend
how to really make someone hurt for the pain they caused to someone else
columbia house
advice from women who have seeked revenge on old lovers
makehimsuffer.com
how to say goodbye hurtfully
how to report child neglect in the state of new hampshire
free articles on gay life that can be mailed to me
free christian things
free gay magazines
free angry stuff to send to an ex lover
how to permanently delete information from your hard drive
makehimpay.net
women’s harley davidson boots
www.match.com
the worst thing to send someone via email
thong dancewear
locatecell.com
what can i do to an old lover for revenge
mean revenge tactics
death records in hampstead new hampshire
And this:
An AOLer who’s an avid motorcyclist and Mustang enthusiast near Reading, Pa., also has some darker tastes, if user 3544012’s search history is any indication. Making the situation more interesting is that user 3544012 may be getting married as well, if his or her searches for wedding table numbers are relevant:
homes for sale in pa
repo cars reading pa
where to get cna license pa (Ed. Note: CNA is a certified nurse aide)
homes for sale in morgantown pa
legends night club reading pa
beasteality
inceststories.free-beastiality.name
hourse f—ing free
progressive motorcycle insurance
circumsize pictures
all inclusive trip to las vegas
mustang svo 2.3 fuel pressure
table numbers for weddings
mustang cobra chrome roll bar
beastiality
coldwell bankers realty
harley performance cafe
mustang sally gentlemans club
I’m not really sure what to make of it, except to say: here is a whole load of suffering; these people are not happy. Presumably this sample is atypical - but I don’t know how atypical this kind of research pattern is, and how hard the CNET news.com researchers had to look. 1 in a thousand? 1 in a hundred? But the main point for me is the human side of this: I’m impressed that user 1515830, who was clearly suffering immensely, made space in her life to think about curtains, of all things. And I’m startled that the longlasting link between car mechanics and porn (I say the word: Pirelli) suddenly has such a vivid verbal expression in the juxtaposition of words flowing out of user 3544012’s head.
Fuel for feminist analysis, here. But also cause for compassion. A lot of it.
23 Responses to “Google, rape and search data”
Leave a Reply
Google, rape and search data
November 14th, 2006
Yesterday, someone came to this blog having typed “HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE” into Google.
(Hello, whoever you were in Falmouth, Maine, USA, using Firefox 2.0 on Microsoft Windows XP. It was 11.15pm for you and your IP was: 72.224.132.# (ROADRUNNER-NYC). I’m sorry you only stayed on here for 0.0 seconds and didn’t have a chance to read the part of my post about not raping women.
If I was a Christian, I’d be praying for you. I’m a meditator, so I’ll be breathing for you instead, doing my best to understand that this kind of Google search can only really come from somebody who is already suffering themselves.)
As you can probably guess, this troubles me. It troubles me that someone is interested in finding out (though granted it could just be research for a fiction book). And it troubles me that we’ve created this thing called the Internet where interested folks can find out. It’s not exactly something they’d ask down the pub, in the Classifieds or over the water cooler at work.
I ran the same Google search myself, to see how they’d got to me. I have a porn filter on my search preferences, I was using google.com, and I was mildly relieved at the results. The first is “How to Prevent Rape”, the second a little more dodgy (I didn’t click through), then there’s “Reduce the Risk of Becoming a Victim of Drug Induced Rape”, “Punishments for rape”, a social welfare article about rape victims, “Can someone rape and not know it”, and then my very own “Flesh, cloth and rape” post, from which Google picks out the phrase: “If you break into a house and find a woman there, don’t rape her. If your friend thinks it’s okay to rape someone, tell him it’s not”.
I felt a small wave of gratitude for Google come over me, and wondered if there was greater censorship than my (self-chosen) porn filter. I was then surprised to find that the term “how to rape” figures on Google’s search trend radar - there’s a fairly vague graph you can examine here, which tells you little more than that there was a marked decrease in searches for ‘how to rape’ in January and February 2006, whatever that might mean.
I’m still troubled by what drives a human being to want to search for those things; and I’m still troubled that we humans have created this beast of the internet that can (in principle) help people find out. After all, “HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE” is a different question from the much more reasonable “WHAT IS RAPE”, and presumably it comes with the corollary “HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE WITHOUT GETTING NICKED” .
I immediately recalled the hoo-haa a few months ago after AOL inadvertently released search data which included which user (a numeric ID) had searched for what (the data was swiftly removed but had already been mirrored here). I can deconstruct my visitor in Falmouth, Maine, and reflect on the bizarre ways in which their unhappy world briefly collided with mine… but it’s altogether more telling when you can pull together a user’s search history over, say, several months. The 3-month AOL database of search terms is startling, revealing as it does users’ deepest (and darkest) queries. CNET News.com pulled together a few user profiles, assembling their queries chronologically:
Based on the number of local searches, AOL user 1515830 appears to be a resident of Ohio’s Mahoning County. On March 1, user 1515830 was trying to find the amount of calories in chai tea and bananas. But on March 9, the searches took a darker turn:
chai tea calories
calories in bananas
aftermath of incest
how to tell your family you’re a victim of incest
pottery barn
curtains
surgical help for depression
oakland raiders comforter set
can you adopt after a suicide attempt
who is not allowed to adopt
i hate men
medication to enhance female desire
jobs in denver colorado
teaching positions in denver colorado
how long will the swelling last after my tummy tuck
divorce laws in ohio
free remote keyloggers
baked macaroni and cheese with sour cream
how to deal with anger
teaching jobs with the denver school system
marriage counseling tips
anti psychotic drugs
There was also this:
Some AOL users seem to be worried that an abusive partner in a relationship may come back to hurt them. This person, AOL user 005315, searched for information about prison inmates, gang members, sociopaths in relationships, and women who were murdered in southern California last year:
resources for utility bill paying assistance in southern california
section 8 housing southern california
los angeles county ca. gang member pictures
orange county california jails inmate information
fractured ankle
letters and responses written by women to emotionally
abusive partners
men that use emotional and physical abandonment to control their partner
warning signs of a mans infidelity or sexual addiction
the sociopathic relationship
southern california newspaper stories about woman murdered by boyfriend in pomona december2005
names of females murdered or found dead in pomona california in 2005
characteristics of a sociopath in a relationship
a person that shows lack of empathy
help in writing a letter to a abusive narcissistic ex boyfriend
how to hurt the narcissistic man
retaliating against the narcisisstic man
And this:
For a three-month period, AOL user 2708, apparently a resident of the greater Boston area, was searching for little else. Her search terms suggest that she signed up her ex-boyfriend for Columbia House CDs, articles on “gay life,” and Christian literature–while shopping for women’s Harley Davidson boots. User 2708’s ex apparently lives in New Hampshire:
revenge tactics
the woman’s book of revenge
dirty tricks for chicks
voice changer
how to humiliate someone
bill me pay later for cd’s
scams to play on people
how to get revenge on an old lover
i hate my ex boyfriend
how to really make someone hurt for the pain they caused to someone else
columbia house
advice from women who have seeked revenge on old lovers
makehimsuffer.com
how to say goodbye hurtfully
how to report child neglect in the state of new hampshire
free articles on gay life that can be mailed to me
free christian things
free gay magazines
free angry stuff to send to an ex lover
how to permanently delete information from your hard drive
makehimpay.net
women’s harley davidson boots
www.match.com
the worst thing to send someone via email
thong dancewear
locatecell.com
what can i do to an old lover for revenge
mean revenge tactics
death records in hampstead new hampshire
And this:
An AOLer who’s an avid motorcyclist and Mustang enthusiast near Reading, Pa., also has some darker tastes, if user 3544012’s search history is any indication. Making the situation more interesting is that user 3544012 may be getting married as well, if his or her searches for wedding table numbers are relevant:
homes for sale in pa
repo cars reading pa
where to get cna license pa (Ed. Note: CNA is a certified nurse aide)
homes for sale in morgantown pa
legends night club reading pa
beasteality
inceststories.free-beastiality.name
hourse f—ing free
progressive motorcycle insurance
circumsize pictures
all inclusive trip to las vegas
mustang svo 2.3 fuel pressure
table numbers for weddings
mustang cobra chrome roll bar
beastiality
coldwell bankers realty
harley performance cafe
mustang sally gentlemans club
I’m not really sure what to make of it, except to say: here is a whole load of suffering; these people are not happy. Presumably this sample is atypical - but I don’t know how atypical this kind of research pattern is, and how hard the CNET news.com researchers had to look. 1 in a thousand? 1 in a hundred? But the main point for me is the human side of this: I’m impressed that user 1515830, who was clearly suffering immensely, made space in her life to think about curtains, of all things. And I’m startled that the longlasting link between car mechanics and porn (I say the word: Pirelli) suddenly has such a vivid verbal expression in the juxtaposition of words flowing out of user 3544012’s head.
Fuel for feminist analysis, here. But also cause for compassion. A lot of it.
23 Responses to “Google, rape and search data”
-
Chris Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 5:25 pmOn my old blog, I had a deeply sarcastic article entitled “Ten Arguments against homosexuality.” It was actually something I’d been forwarded and re-written: a series of flagrantly homophobic or straw-man arguments that actually served to reverse the intent of the article’s title.
It was a well-established blog with lots of links, so Google was always kind. In a matter of days, the article was drawing tons of traffic.
What horrified me were the search strings. People were coming to my blog looking with searches like “reasons homo faggots should die” and far, far worse.
A lot of the searches were clearly by Christian fundamentalists looking for ammunition to beat gays over the head.
It was so bad I eventually took the article down and did a redirect to a site about how to be tolerant toward people who are different than you.
I found it difficult to be tolerant to the haters from Google.
Must … breathe … deeply.
-
James Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 5:29 pmJust in case this prick (I use the term deliberately) decides to come back to sniff out stuff on rape again, I have a link for him from today’s Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/congo/story/0,,1947147,00.html
-
patterner Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 5:46 pmYou can look at the same graph for the whole world and click on the regions tab - Pakistan and India stand out I guess for reasons of population size, though that’s depressing enough, question is, what’s going on in New Zealand?
Scary. -
natasha Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 6:01 pmI just read the article, James, and it’s painful reading.
I reached for the magisterial War and Gender book by Joshua S. Goldstein (2001). He quotes Ruth Seifert (1996):
“Rape at once pollutes and occupies the territory of the nation, transgresses its boundaries, defeats its protectors… [it is] the most severe attack imaginable upon the intimate self and the dignity of a human being”.
Goldstein reckons that “rape as an instrument of territorial control and domination seems to have spread in the 1990s” (( p.363 )) . Now that is worrying.
He mentions Bosnia, the genocide in Rwanda, Mozambique in 1991 and the Haitian military’s suppression of resistance, and also: Liberia, Sierra Leone, Burundi, Uganda, Algeria, Indonesia, Kashmir and Burma - all supported by Human Rights Watch data.
-
patterner Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 6:14 pmawh man - it gets even worse. and I’m sure this is just the tip of the iceberg. The mind boggles - I don’t even want to think about what other searches the people of this planet could be making.
And still New Zealand - what is that about?
I am crushed by sadness.
-
natasha Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 6:17 pmChris -
It sounds like you did a good thing. Respect. -
white_light Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 7:22 pmTotal recorded rape by country:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap_percap-crime-rapes-per-capita
Both NZ and Australia are surprisingly high.
-
James Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 7:56 pmWhen Google Trends first came out a while back, I punched in many of the usual search terms - partly out of a voyeuristic desire to see what the world was looking for, and partly to check up on the urban myths I heard circulating that the countries who searched for ‘boy sex’ ‘boy rape’ and so on were also the most conservatively Islamic; ie Saudi, Pakistan, and so. This accusation was made by some right-wing commentators to argue that Islamic extremsim is motivated something as easily brackete as sexual frustration gone wrong.
OK. I hope it is understood that don’t want to get into a debate that could encourage extremism and the like. However, the urban myths were true. Pakistan ranks consistently highest for these searches, along with the UAE, Indonesia, and so on. Many of these results, as the patterner points out, are due to the demograhy of the countries at stake (especially Pakistan). But for the results to be so consistent? And with smaller countries like the UAE? I knew that this would be the kind of balanced, respectful place where I could broach this topic without fear of Islamophobic responses. But on the subject of these searches for ‘rape’, what do you make of the findings?
Patterner, as for NZ - I have NO idea.
-
natasha Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 8:07 pmI’m aware that there’s less access to light pornography (lads mags etc) and perhaps also to harder stuff that Anglophone countries can buy in the local newsagent. This might mean the internet is the sole access point for porn… so there’s just a higher incidence of porn searches.
Maybe the searches for rape could be explained simply by an overall higher incidence of porn searches?
-
natasha Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 8:13 pm(Incidentally, please, dear female readers, don’t hold back from commenting. What do you think?)
-
Feminist Law Professors » Blog Archive » The Links Are On Me! Says:
November 14th, 2006 at 11:59 pm[…] “Google, Rape and Search Data” at Feminish […]
-
Quick Informative on Law Related ! » The Links Are On Me! Says:
November 15th, 2006 at 2:03 am[…] “Google, Rape and Search Data” at Feminish […]
-
BEG Says:
November 15th, 2006 at 2:31 amWell, I could see using that phrase myself to look for ways of avoiding ways in which I might be raped, although I agree it seems to have been used in a much darker context.
Dunno what to *say*, really… Privacy benefits as many people as it hides.
-
belledame222 Says:
November 15th, 2006 at 8:07 am>HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE WITHOUT GETTING NICKED” .>
I guess that must be what it means. I just thought, jesus christ, you asshole, how d’you -think-?
seriously, (well, half) -is- there some sort of “raping for dummies” guide floating around on the internets? maybe this would actually be a good thing for the rest of us to know about…
-
natasha Says:
November 15th, 2006 at 11:29 amMaybe it would… in the spirit of ‘knowing thy enemy’ and knowing how bad things actually are (I’m often surprised that some people are still in doubt)
…. but I’d rather not be the one to look for it.
Volunteers?
-
belledame222 Says:
November 16th, 2006 at 2:08 amWell, I’ll tell you what comes sort of close, by my lights: google PUA or “pickup artist,” or “Ross Jeffries.” It’s not exactly about -rape-, as in roofies and avoiding the law and shit. but you will find an awful lot of “oh, jesus, so THAT’S what they’re thinking when they harass/approach me like that?!” seriously, it’s like “how to be a sexist creep” in case one didn’t already have the basics down.
-
natasha Says:
November 16th, 2006 at 12:29 pmRoss Jeffries:
Jeffries claims the inspiration for speed seduction came from martial arts. “I thought to myself, a guy’s five-foot tall, 90 pounds, and knows wing-chun and he can kick the ass of a guy who’s six foot-five, 250 pounds of solid muscle - there’s got to be something like that when it comes to dating. Because I did pretty poorly at dating, I thought, there has to be a way around this, I can’t accept that the only thing I get in life is the women who like me or the leftovers. There has to be another way.”
“I started doing NLP [Neuro Linguistic Programming] …I thought, ‘Great I can create a martial art for guys to attract women using these principles’.”
[interview with STUDIO for Men magazine 1997]
-
natasha Says:
November 16th, 2006 at 12:44 pm“According to Jeffries, using such phrases as “feel a big happiness inside” (pronounced “hap-penis”) or “below me” (pronounced “blow me”) will invoke in your victim an uncontrollable urge to do just that.”
(excuse me while I splutter into my morning cuppa….)
Nuff said.
-
per Says:
November 19th, 2006 at 8:00 pm“I ran the same Google search myself”
it’s okay. I am breathing for you.
“I’m still troubled by what drives a human being to want to search for those things; and I’m still troubled that we humans have created this beast of the internet that can (in principle) help people find out.”
maybe we should have a law, that puts people in jail if they type such things ?
deeply troubled,
per -
Mike Says:
November 25th, 2006 at 7:56 amI actually found your site with that search, ha. But I’m not a bad guy or anything, I’m a pretty nice person- but the girl I am with and I have talked about this sort of thing, and she has a fantasy about it and I was just trying to find some help in how I’d help us work it out, because honestly I’ve got no fucking clue.
So, it’s possible they’re not all criminals. -
simply wondered Says:
November 29th, 2006 at 12:26 pmAccording to Jeffries, using such phrases as “feel a big happiness inside” (pronounced “hap-penis”) or “below me” (pronounced “blow me”) will invoke in your victim an uncontrollable urge to do just that.” - and perhaps if you offer Jeffries ‘four cough sweets’ or ‘an immense go fuck yourself you stupid stupid individual respect (pronounced STUPID)’ he would have that very uncontrollable urge invoked in him??? Might be worth a try, though.
And as a male, i shall allow one of the women to address the delightful mike above… -
matt Says:
April 7th, 2007 at 2:06 amHere I was thinking I was the only one who would come up with the idea to search for How To Rape Someone. Shows how silly I am! It’s not that I’m interested in actually carrying out this kind of sinister agenda, I just wanted to see what came up. Besides, the more you know your enemy, the better.
-
Noah Says:
April 22nd, 2007 at 3:16 amI know I am asking for it but here goes.
Some Criticisms :
Ethical :
In the first few paragraphs you express shock and disdain for someone you do not know based solely on a text string.
To demonize this person without research into context strikes me as a unfair. Are you truly willing to believe that this single text string provides enough information to make a person guilty of criminal intent?
Later in the article you seem to be making assumptions of harmful intent after reviewing extremely limited information with _no_ supporting context. Making assumptions based on such limited data is gross speculation
You later refer to AOL user 1515830 as a respectable female survivor and user 3544012 as an alarming male deviant. Neither the content of the query list or the original source for that information makes this determination. This determination of whom was male or female seems to be based on emotional bias rather than fact. I feel that any of these users could be male _or_ female.
Practical :
In your 4th and 5th paragraph you express concern about the current level of freedom to information. You seem to express fear that free access to information about rape will result in more rape, and that some method of control or censorship is needed.
The logical problem with this is that knowledge is like a gun, it can be used in positive and negative ways depending on the intent of the user. Anyone seriously contemplating raping someone is not likely to be balked by a lack of a rape ‘how-to’ document.
Technically, until we can censor access in such a way that only users with non-harmful intent are allowed access, while also allowing for freedom an expression (A near-impossible task), the most practical approach available to us is to allow the same freedom of access to all.
Example : a seriously motivated individual would likely be more subtle in their search (reviewing police reports and local crimes stats would seem a logical choice of data for review). Would you want access to this sort of data blocked?
There are very good reasons why censorship is something to be avoided, read up at www.eff.org for more info.
Technical :
“HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE” In this instance it is important to understand that this singular query represents an incomplete search transaction. The string used is likely to have been one of several iterations selected by the user while tuning their query.
Google Trend Reports are misleading (the feature is still beta), functionally any query that contains the words ‘how’ and ‘to’ and ‘rape’ in _any_ order is counted. This means that any query with those words is being counted, even if it also contains words like ‘prevention’,'community’,etc.
Emotional :
At a basic level I feel that you fail to acknowledge and provide for basic human curiosity and variety. There are women who are interested in odd sex practices and high performance motor vehicles. There are men who are victims of incest and rape who are also concerned about their diet.
The level of emotional charge and anti-male bias present in this and many other conversations about rape creates an negative intellectual environment in which objectiveness is less important than preaching the pro-female - anti-male agenda. This actively prevents effective male participation and understanding of the issues and delays any possible hope for improvement.
Please let me know if anything I said was confusing or needs clarification.
Regards,
-Noah
November 14th, 2006 at 5:25 pm
On my old blog, I had a deeply sarcastic article entitled “Ten Arguments against homosexuality.” It was actually something I’d been forwarded and re-written: a series of flagrantly homophobic or straw-man arguments that actually served to reverse the intent of the article’s title.
It was a well-established blog with lots of links, so Google was always kind. In a matter of days, the article was drawing tons of traffic.
What horrified me were the search strings. People were coming to my blog looking with searches like “reasons homo faggots should die” and far, far worse.
A lot of the searches were clearly by Christian fundamentalists looking for ammunition to beat gays over the head.
It was so bad I eventually took the article down and did a redirect to a site about how to be tolerant toward people who are different than you.
I found it difficult to be tolerant to the haters from Google.
Must … breathe … deeply.
November 14th, 2006 at 5:29 pm
Just in case this prick (I use the term deliberately) decides to come back to sniff out stuff on rape again, I have a link for him from today’s Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/congo/story/0,,1947147,00.html
November 14th, 2006 at 5:46 pm
You can look at the same graph for the whole world and click on the regions tab - Pakistan and India stand out I guess for reasons of population size, though that’s depressing enough, question is, what’s going on in New Zealand?
Scary.
November 14th, 2006 at 6:01 pm
I just read the article, James, and it’s painful reading.
I reached for the magisterial War and Gender book by Joshua S. Goldstein (2001). He quotes Ruth Seifert (1996):
“Rape at once pollutes and occupies the territory of the nation, transgresses its boundaries, defeats its protectors… [it is] the most severe attack imaginable upon the intimate self and the dignity of a human being”.
Goldstein reckons that “rape as an instrument of territorial control and domination seems to have spread in the 1990s” (( p.363 )) . Now that is worrying.
He mentions Bosnia, the genocide in Rwanda, Mozambique in 1991 and the Haitian military’s suppression of resistance, and also: Liberia, Sierra Leone, Burundi, Uganda, Algeria, Indonesia, Kashmir and Burma - all supported by Human Rights Watch data.
November 14th, 2006 at 6:14 pm
awh man - it gets even worse. and I’m sure this is just the tip of the iceberg. The mind boggles - I don’t even want to think about what other searches the people of this planet could be making.
And still New Zealand - what is that about?
I am crushed by sadness.
November 14th, 2006 at 6:17 pm
Chris -
It sounds like you did a good thing. Respect.
November 14th, 2006 at 7:22 pm
Total recorded rape by country:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap_percap-crime-rapes-per-capita
Both NZ and Australia are surprisingly high.
November 14th, 2006 at 7:56 pm
When Google Trends first came out a while back, I punched in many of the usual search terms - partly out of a voyeuristic desire to see what the world was looking for, and partly to check up on the urban myths I heard circulating that the countries who searched for ‘boy sex’ ‘boy rape’ and so on were also the most conservatively Islamic; ie Saudi, Pakistan, and so. This accusation was made by some right-wing commentators to argue that Islamic extremsim is motivated something as easily brackete as sexual frustration gone wrong.
OK. I hope it is understood that don’t want to get into a debate that could encourage extremism and the like. However, the urban myths were true. Pakistan ranks consistently highest for these searches, along with the UAE, Indonesia, and so on. Many of these results, as the patterner points out, are due to the demograhy of the countries at stake (especially Pakistan). But for the results to be so consistent? And with smaller countries like the UAE? I knew that this would be the kind of balanced, respectful place where I could broach this topic without fear of Islamophobic responses. But on the subject of these searches for ‘rape’, what do you make of the findings?
Patterner, as for NZ - I have NO idea.
November 14th, 2006 at 8:07 pm
I’m aware that there’s less access to light pornography (lads mags etc) and perhaps also to harder stuff that Anglophone countries can buy in the local newsagent. This might mean the internet is the sole access point for porn… so there’s just a higher incidence of porn searches.
Maybe the searches for rape could be explained simply by an overall higher incidence of porn searches?
November 14th, 2006 at 8:13 pm
(Incidentally, please, dear female readers, don’t hold back from commenting. What do you think?)
November 14th, 2006 at 11:59 pm
[…] “Google, Rape and Search Data” at Feminish […]
November 15th, 2006 at 2:03 am
[…] “Google, Rape and Search Data” at Feminish […]
November 15th, 2006 at 2:31 am
Well, I could see using that phrase myself to look for ways of avoiding ways in which I might be raped, although I agree it seems to have been used in a much darker context.
Dunno what to *say*, really… Privacy benefits as many people as it hides.
November 15th, 2006 at 8:07 am
>HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE WITHOUT GETTING NICKED” .>
I guess that must be what it means. I just thought, jesus christ, you asshole, how d’you -think-?
seriously, (well, half) -is- there some sort of “raping for dummies” guide floating around on the internets? maybe this would actually be a good thing for the rest of us to know about…
November 15th, 2006 at 11:29 am
Maybe it would… in the spirit of ‘knowing thy enemy’ and knowing how bad things actually are (I’m often surprised that some people are still in doubt)
…. but I’d rather not be the one to look for it.
Volunteers?
November 16th, 2006 at 2:08 am
Well, I’ll tell you what comes sort of close, by my lights: google PUA or “pickup artist,” or “Ross Jeffries.” It’s not exactly about -rape-, as in roofies and avoiding the law and shit. but you will find an awful lot of “oh, jesus, so THAT’S what they’re thinking when they harass/approach me like that?!” seriously, it’s like “how to be a sexist creep” in case one didn’t already have the basics down.
November 16th, 2006 at 12:29 pm
Ross Jeffries:
[interview with STUDIO for Men magazine 1997]
November 16th, 2006 at 12:44 pm
“According to Jeffries, using such phrases as “feel a big happiness inside” (pronounced “hap-penis”) or “below me” (pronounced “blow me”) will invoke in your victim an uncontrollable urge to do just that.”
(excuse me while I splutter into my morning cuppa….)
Nuff said.
November 19th, 2006 at 8:00 pm
“I ran the same Google search myself”
it’s okay. I am breathing for you.
“I’m still troubled by what drives a human being to want to search for those things; and I’m still troubled that we humans have created this beast of the internet that can (in principle) help people find out.”
maybe we should have a law, that puts people in jail if they type such things ?
deeply troubled,
per
November 25th, 2006 at 7:56 am
I actually found your site with that search, ha. But I’m not a bad guy or anything, I’m a pretty nice person- but the girl I am with and I have talked about this sort of thing, and she has a fantasy about it and I was just trying to find some help in how I’d help us work it out, because honestly I’ve got no fucking clue.
So, it’s possible they’re not all criminals.
November 29th, 2006 at 12:26 pm
According to Jeffries, using such phrases as “feel a big happiness inside” (pronounced “hap-penis”) or “below me” (pronounced “blow me”) will invoke in your victim an uncontrollable urge to do just that.” - and perhaps if you offer Jeffries ‘four cough sweets’ or ‘an immense go fuck yourself you stupid stupid individual respect (pronounced STUPID)’ he would have that very uncontrollable urge invoked in him??? Might be worth a try, though.
And as a male, i shall allow one of the women to address the delightful mike above…
April 7th, 2007 at 2:06 am
Here I was thinking I was the only one who would come up with the idea to search for How To Rape Someone. Shows how silly I am! It’s not that I’m interested in actually carrying out this kind of sinister agenda, I just wanted to see what came up. Besides, the more you know your enemy, the better.
April 22nd, 2007 at 3:16 am
I know I am asking for it but here goes.
Some Criticisms :
Ethical :
In the first few paragraphs you express shock and disdain for someone you do not know based solely on a text string.
To demonize this person without research into context strikes me as a unfair. Are you truly willing to believe that this single text string provides enough information to make a person guilty of criminal intent?
Later in the article you seem to be making assumptions of harmful intent after reviewing extremely limited information with _no_ supporting context. Making assumptions based on such limited data is gross speculation
You later refer to AOL user 1515830 as a respectable female survivor and user 3544012 as an alarming male deviant. Neither the content of the query list or the original source for that information makes this determination. This determination of whom was male or female seems to be based on emotional bias rather than fact. I feel that any of these users could be male _or_ female.
Practical :
In your 4th and 5th paragraph you express concern about the current level of freedom to information. You seem to express fear that free access to information about rape will result in more rape, and that some method of control or censorship is needed.
The logical problem with this is that knowledge is like a gun, it can be used in positive and negative ways depending on the intent of the user. Anyone seriously contemplating raping someone is not likely to be balked by a lack of a rape ‘how-to’ document.
Technically, until we can censor access in such a way that only users with non-harmful intent are allowed access, while also allowing for freedom an expression (A near-impossible task), the most practical approach available to us is to allow the same freedom of access to all.
Example : a seriously motivated individual would likely be more subtle in their search (reviewing police reports and local crimes stats would seem a logical choice of data for review). Would you want access to this sort of data blocked?
There are very good reasons why censorship is something to be avoided, read up at www.eff.org for more info.
Technical :
“HOW TO RAPE SOMEONE” In this instance it is important to understand that this singular query represents an incomplete search transaction. The string used is likely to have been one of several iterations selected by the user while tuning their query.
Google Trend Reports are misleading (the feature is still beta), functionally any query that contains the words ‘how’ and ‘to’ and ‘rape’ in _any_ order is counted. This means that any query with those words is being counted, even if it also contains words like ‘prevention’,'community’,etc.
Emotional :
At a basic level I feel that you fail to acknowledge and provide for basic human curiosity and variety. There are women who are interested in odd sex practices and high performance motor vehicles. There are men who are victims of incest and rape who are also concerned about their diet.
The level of emotional charge and anti-male bias present in this and many other conversations about rape creates an negative intellectual environment in which objectiveness is less important than preaching the pro-female - anti-male agenda. This actively prevents effective male participation and understanding of the issues and delays any possible hope for improvement.
Please let me know if anything I said was confusing or needs clarification.
Regards,
-Noah