Lowering the tone, upping the humour. Especially for Dom.
December 6th, 2006
This one’s for someone called Dom,
an old friend who sent me an email a few days back. If I remember correctly, our first encounter was a couple of eons ago when, at 2 in the morning, it seemed (to me) like a good idea to knock on the tiny fire-escape door between our college rooms to ask him if, by any chance, a little Something from his free student union ‘freshers pack’ might be going spare…
I was moved by his email’s kind words and tickled by his insightful analysis of Hackney trains ( “full of character and characters; Christian preachers, burqa-wearing mothers with denim-clad toddlers, young Afro-Caribbean guys who have been working so hard that they sleep standing - and me, the only suit-wearer, feeling a bit like I’ve been sent to do a survey…”).
But it was this question that hit my nail on my head (as-it-were),
Tasha, in almost-total ignorance of your life right now, I have to ask one thing: Is there room in your life for humour and the unexpected? (So inextricably linked, I know, but I couldn’t decide which one should take priority). For me, this has been my salvation in all the big moments. If not, I will have to come find you, jump out from behind trees and tell you jokes.
Now there’s a threat if ever there was one.
Never mind your meditating, Natasha, never mind all this earnest ’simple life’ stuff and all those ‘interesting’ books you’re reading and all those nice thoughts you’re having, and all those organic good-for-you legumes you’re munching ever-so-mindfully, the real question is - in fact, the only question is - are you having fun?
It’d like to say “no”, if only to enjoy being startled out of solemn meditation under a ficus religiousa by a man in a suit with a joke. But, because I don’t know how long I’d have to wait in this profound state for Dom to learn himself some jokes, catch the Ryan Air and track me and my bodhi down, it’s probably simpler to confess that I have been giggling a lot and am still pointlessly frivolous.
In the spirit of which, and against my better judgement, I’d like to share two videos. Both made me laugh. Both are pointless. (If you have a deadline, please spare yourself. I believe they cost the Patterner a few bars of his Third Movement yesterday…)
The first is Britney Spears (How many female popstars does it take to fill up a petrol tank? How bizarre can celebrity be?):
X17: Britney in Action Scroll down a little to see the video.
The second is Kamini - the black rural rapper that has taken France by storm since his homemade video hit YouTube last month (2m downloads to date) - brought to you today in tribute to the general hilarity of Rural France which has so kindly taken us both in:
2 Responses to “Lowering the tone, upping the humour. Especially for Dom.”
Leave a Reply
Lowering the tone, upping the humour. Especially for Dom.
December 6th, 2006
This one’s for someone called Dom,
an old friend who sent me an email a few days back. If I remember correctly, our first encounter was a couple of eons ago when, at 2 in the morning, it seemed (to me) like a good idea to knock on the tiny fire-escape door between our college rooms to ask him if, by any chance, a little Something from his free student union ‘freshers pack’ might be going spare…
I was moved by his email’s kind words and tickled by his insightful analysis of Hackney trains ( “full of character and characters; Christian preachers, burqa-wearing mothers with denim-clad toddlers, young Afro-Caribbean guys who have been working so hard that they sleep standing - and me, the only suit-wearer, feeling a bit like I’ve been sent to do a survey…”).
But it was this question that hit my nail on my head (as-it-were),
Tasha, in almost-total ignorance of your life right now, I have to ask one thing: Is there room in your life for humour and the unexpected? (So inextricably linked, I know, but I couldn’t decide which one should take priority). For me, this has been my salvation in all the big moments. If not, I will have to come find you, jump out from behind trees and tell you jokes.
Now there’s a threat if ever there was one.
Never mind your meditating, Natasha, never mind all this earnest ’simple life’ stuff and all those ‘interesting’ books you’re reading and all those nice thoughts you’re having, and all those organic good-for-you legumes you’re munching ever-so-mindfully, the real question is - in fact, the only question is - are you having fun?
It’d like to say “no”, if only to enjoy being startled out of solemn meditation under a ficus religiousa by a man in a suit with a joke. But, because I don’t know how long I’d have to wait in this profound state for Dom to learn himself some jokes, catch the Ryan Air and track me and my bodhi down, it’s probably simpler to confess that I have been giggling a lot and am still pointlessly frivolous.
In the spirit of which, and against my better judgement, I’d like to share two videos. Both made me laugh. Both are pointless. (If you have a deadline, please spare yourself. I believe they cost the Patterner a few bars of his Third Movement yesterday…)
The first is Britney Spears (How many female popstars does it take to fill up a petrol tank? How bizarre can celebrity be?):
X17: Britney in Action Scroll down a little to see the video.
The second is Kamini - the black rural rapper that has taken France by storm since his homemade video hit YouTube last month (2m downloads to date) - brought to you today in tribute to the general hilarity of Rural France which has so kindly taken us both in:
2 Responses to “Lowering the tone, upping the humour. Especially for Dom.”
-
palimpsest Says:
December 7th, 2006 at 1:21 amI’m sorry but that Britney thing/situation/event did not make me laugh in any way and I’m quite shocked that you chose to link to it in a post which is supposed to be lowering the tone. I think it does lower the tone - but in quite the wrong way.
Please don’t get me wrong - I love this blog and I’m sure you’re by far the best judge of what is or is not appropriate content and I’m also sure that you have plenty of interesting things to say about the video. What I can’t understand is why you think it’s funny.
All I can see in it is suffering. I can’t help feeling sorry for this girl who grins and mugs for the camera but has so little room to breathe that she can’t even work out which way to approach the pump. And through all that grinning and mugging the eyes remain sad and lost. I feel sorry for her because she thinks that what she has is desirable. She thinks that she should want what she has.
And I feel sorry for the cameramen and women - who think that other people should want what she has - and who think that their life is well spent running around harassing people who seem to have something that everyone else is supposed to want.
But Kamini is cool. Sure he’s suffered too and he’s angry about some stuff but at least he has the space and the groundedness to say something intelligent and funny about it. To respond positively. All I could see in the first video was people running away from their pain. Let’s hope that Kamini’s success does not lead him into the same trap.
-
natasha Says:
December 8th, 2006 at 4:03 pmI see what you’re saying, Palimpsest.
It’s not funny ha-ha… but after I saw it, the film really stuck in my gender prism, and I couldn’t shake it out of my head.I found it so bizarre that celebrity is actually like that… that the experience of filling up at a petrol station can be so intense. I’ve done the whole late-night, short-dress and heels fill-up and it was stressful enough without a dozen paparazzi swarming around me and strobing my every move with their flashes.
What really struck me was the way the photographers ended up filling her tank so she could sit in the car. Did they do this because a) she’s a woman and it isn’t ‘right’ for her to do it herself or, b) because they saw that it was appalling to be swarming so close when there’s no escape from the petrol tank - and they were putting a bit of reasonable difference between subject and object.
The thing it reminded me most of was the relation between media and politics at Westminster… the lines blur between subject and object, producer and produced.
December 7th, 2006 at 1:21 am
I’m sorry but that Britney thing/situation/event did not make me laugh in any way and I’m quite shocked that you chose to link to it in a post which is supposed to be lowering the tone. I think it does lower the tone - but in quite the wrong way.
Please don’t get me wrong - I love this blog and I’m sure you’re by far the best judge of what is or is not appropriate content and I’m also sure that you have plenty of interesting things to say about the video. What I can’t understand is why you think it’s funny.
All I can see in it is suffering. I can’t help feeling sorry for this girl who grins and mugs for the camera but has so little room to breathe that she can’t even work out which way to approach the pump. And through all that grinning and mugging the eyes remain sad and lost. I feel sorry for her because she thinks that what she has is desirable. She thinks that she should want what she has.
And I feel sorry for the cameramen and women - who think that other people should want what she has - and who think that their life is well spent running around harassing people who seem to have something that everyone else is supposed to want.
But Kamini is cool. Sure he’s suffered too and he’s angry about some stuff but at least he has the space and the groundedness to say something intelligent and funny about it. To respond positively. All I could see in the first video was people running away from their pain. Let’s hope that Kamini’s success does not lead him into the same trap.
December 8th, 2006 at 4:03 pm
I see what you’re saying, Palimpsest.
It’s not funny ha-ha… but after I saw it, the film really stuck in my gender prism, and I couldn’t shake it out of my head.
I found it so bizarre that celebrity is actually like that… that the experience of filling up at a petrol station can be so intense. I’ve done the whole late-night, short-dress and heels fill-up and it was stressful enough without a dozen paparazzi swarming around me and strobing my every move with their flashes.
What really struck me was the way the photographers ended up filling her tank so she could sit in the car. Did they do this because a) she’s a woman and it isn’t ‘right’ for her to do it herself or, b) because they saw that it was appalling to be swarming so close when there’s no escape from the petrol tank - and they were putting a bit of reasonable difference between subject and object.
The thing it reminded me most of was the relation between media and politics at Westminster… the lines blur between subject and object, producer and produced.